Friday, March 6, 2015
PUFA Increases Postprandial Thermogenesis in Healthy Premenopausal Women Beyond 14 Increase Over MUFA SFA Sounds Huge But Does it Matter
Is there something to the good vs. bad fat shenanigan, after all? |
Reason enough to take a closer look at this and previous studies investigating the diet-induced thermogenic effects of PUFA-, MUFA- and SFA-rich meals and to conduct a reality check wrt to the question whether these differences actually matter - I mean, will you get and stay lean by upping your PUFA intake? Lets take a look!
You can learn more about fat at the SuppVersity
Are Men Fat- & Women Sugar-Cravers?
Fat, not Fructose Cons. Increased in the US
Adding Fats to Carbs Does not Reduce Insulin
The Forgotten Pro-Insulinogenic Effects of SFAs
Margarine Not Butter Incr. EU Waists
Low Fat to Blame for Low Vitamin D Epidemic?
Based on previous research in men of normal weight, the Texas Tech researchers hypothesized that the diet induced thermogenesis (DIT) and fat oxidation would be the highest after the PUFA- and MUFA-rich meals and lowest after the SFA-rich meal in premenopausal women - a result of which you already know that it was only partly confirmed.
Figure 1: Diet-induced thermogenesis and respiratory exchange rate (higher RER = lower fatty acid oxidation vs. higher CHO oxidation) in the 5h after the test meal (Clevenger. 2014) |
The PUFA-rich meal was ‘base’ plus sunflower oil and flaxseed oil, with 42% of total energy coming from PUFA.Table 1: Liquid meal nutrient composition
breakdown (Clevenger. 2014).
- The MUFA-rich meal was ‘base’ plus canola oil and extra virgin olive oil, with 42% of total energy coming from MUFA.
- Finally, the SFA-rich meal was ‘base’ plus butter, coconut oil and palm oil, with 40% of total energy coming from SFA.
High MUFA diets, on the other hand, have been shown to potentiate the effects of weight loss in obese NIDDM patients (Low. 1996). They are the major group of fatty acids in the one oil, everyone appears to agree that its health (Olive oil). And last but not least, even the allegedly unhealthy omega-6s have been shown in randomized controlled to reduce liver fat and modestly improve metabolic status, without weight loss, when compared to high saturated fat diets (Bjermo. 2012).
All of these effects / this evidence could potentially be more important than the increase postprandial thermogenesis in the study at hand - so the ultimate question is: Does DIT even matter?
Now, does this increase in DIT matter? Westerterpet et al. who found a negative correlation between body fat levels and the diet induced thermogenesis in their 2008 study (Westerterpet al. 2008), certainly believe it matters. If we look at the total extra diet-induced energy expenditure in 5h after the test-meal in the study at hand, on the other hand, I cannot but ask myself, whether those 1.4kcal can actually make a difference.
I am not sure what you think, but considering the fact that you can burn those 1.4 extra calories in less than one minute in the gym, its hard to believe that the increased thermogenesis alone warrants the laymans conclusion that the study at hand would provide evidence for the superiority ot PUFAs over MUFAs and saturated fats ... what do you think?
References:I am not sure what you think, but considering the fact that you can burn those 1.4 extra calories in less than one minute in the gym, its hard to believe that the increased thermogenesis alone warrants the laymans conclusion that the study at hand would provide evidence for the superiority ot PUFAs over MUFAs and saturated fats ... what do you think?
- Bjermo, Helena, et al. "Effects of n− 6 PUFAs compared with SFAs on liver fat, lipoproteins, and inflammation in abdominal obesity: a randomized controlled trial." The American journal of clinical nutrition 95.5 (2012): 1003-1012.
- Clevenger, Hui C., et al. "Acute effect of dietary fatty acid composition on postprandial metabolism in women." Experimental physiology (2014): expphysiol-2013.
- Westerterp, Klaas R., et al. "Dietary fat oxidation as a function of body fat." The American journal of clinical nutrition 87.1 (2008): 132-135.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment