Showing posts with label cholesterol. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cholesterol. Show all posts

Sunday, March 22, 2015

New to the anti cholesterol diet!


You have too much cholesterol? The first step is to look at the side of your plate and put you on anti-cholesterol diet. Or it may not be as restrictive as it was. While it is based on limiting fats, a study suggests that the introduction of certain foods would just as effective in the fight against cholesterol.



When the anti-cholesterol diet is a must ...

People with high cholesterol levels should adopt a diet low in cholesterol to regain normal blood levels of cholesterol and thus reduce their cardiovascular risk.
Let us recall that too much cholesterol is bad for the arteries. Excess cholesterol tends to be deposited inside the artery walls, forming what are called atherosclerotic plaques. The latter reduces the diameter of the arteries and may clog, but they can also detach and migrate through the bloodstream into the brain, causing a stroke.
A support for reducing cholesterol levels is essential. If drug treatments are very effective (statins), they do not replace the anti-cholesterol diet, and are often prescribed as second line.

Relaxation of anti-cholesterol diet

The classic anti-cholesterol diet is to reduce its intake of lipids, particularly high cholesterol foods. However there are some food categories which are known to have anti-cholestérolémiantes properties. To test the effectiveness of these foods, the researchers designed a diet including regular consumption of these foods. Called Portfolio, it is to focus on the following foods:
soluble fiber (psyllium, oat ...)
plant sterols, particularly through margarine enriched with plant sterols,
soybean (soy milk, tofu, soy meat)
almonds and walnuts.
Some 300 volunteers with high cholesterol were assigned to follow either the classic anti-cholesterol diet or the Portfolio diet. Others have taken a cholesterol-lowering drug, a statin.
Their bad cholesterol (LDL) cholesterol was measured at the beginning and end of the study, 6 months later.

What result in reducing cholesterol?

We notice that the most effective diet is the Portfolio, with 13% reduction in LDL cholesterol, against 3% with the conventional system. As to the statin, it is twice as efficient as the Portfolio scheme, which also indicates that the Portfolio scheme has the effect of a half dose of statin! And that results in a theoretical 11% reduction in the risk of stroke with the Portfolio diet, while statins have demonstrated their ability to reduce mortality in many studies.

In conclusion, the "anti-cholesterol" diet should be considered in a much more comprehensive way. Limit fats and cholesterol-rich foods remains a basic setpoint, which it makes sense to integrate the consumption of foods that have the property of reducing cholesterol.
Read more »

Friday, March 6, 2015

Panel Urges Testing Kids Cholesterol Youve Got To Be Kidding!

Protecting our kids or another excuse to make $$ ?

Follow Foods For Long Life on FACEBOOK !


Unbelievable!
I was going to spend my day happily creating more Thanksgiving recipes until I read the article on cholesterol testing for children. I already heard about it on the news but seeing it in print this morning just reignited my disgust.
In case you havent heard, new guidelines issued by an "expert panel" appointed by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute recommend that EVERY child should be tested for high cholesterol between the ages of 9 and 11. The American Academy of Pediatrics also endorsed it. I ask myself, "just how many free trips to Hawaii can Pfizer afford to give away?"
Ironically, many experts feel that testing C-reactive protein, not cholesterol, is a better way to predict future cardiovascular disease.


Well Rehearsed Talking Points
And all the doctors have rehearsed the talking points:
* Knowing a childs cholesterol level could be helpful. 
(What would be even MORE helpful would be to ask them about their diet and how much time they spend exercising!). 
* The reason for testing everyone is that targeted screening doesnt work. 
(What they really mean is that "targeted screening" doesnt bring in as much money as testing every child in America and writing additional statin prescriptions!)
* High cholesterol in children would be addressed with diet and exercise. 
(Really? Is that why tens of millions of people take statins today? If so many doctors have given up on telling adults to diet and exercise, why would they prescribe that for their children?)
* Less than 1% of children would end up taking statins. 
(Do you believe this? If a child is tested for something, you can bet they will be treated.)


About the Panel
According to the Associated Press, "several doctors on the guideline panel have received consulting fees or have had other financial ties to makers of cholesterol medications". Not a surprise, Im sad to say. How these self serving and unethical practices continue to be tolerated is beyond me. 


Who Stands to Gain?
Besides the obvious winners, the pharmaceutical companies who will no doubt be selling statins to a new group of young clients for many decades, theres a ton of money to be made on the tests themselves. A lab test screening for cholesterol costs around $80 and if they test for triglycerides, thats another $30 to $50. Multiply that by every 9 year old child in America, and were talking serious money.
But at the end of the day, we will be footing the bill for this unnecessary protocol. The insurance companies will have to reimburse for this (since its now "officially" a guideline) and our insurance premiums will no doubt go even higher!


The Risks
Once a person takes statins, they rarely get off of them. So if someone begins this regimen as a child, they have many years of taking this powerful medication ahead of them. There are serious concerns about what risks a person faces with decades of statin use. The risks associated with the statin, Lipitor, are not something I would ever want to subject my children to!

The Possible Side Effects of the statin, LIPITOR, Listed on the Pfizer Website: 
These serious side effects include:
Muscle problems. LIPITOR can cause serious muscle problems that can lead to kidney problems, including kidney failure. You have a higher chance for muscle problems if you are taking certain other medicines with LIPITOR.
Liver problems. LIPITOR can cause liver problems. Your doctor may do blood tests to check your liver before you start taking LIPITOR, and while you take it.
Call your doctor right away if:
You have muscle problems like weakness, tenderness, or pain that happen without a good reason, especially if you also have a fever or feel more tired than usual
You have allergic reactions including swelling of the face, lips, tongue, and/or throat that may cause difficulty in breathing or swallowing, which may require treatment right away
You experience nausea and vomiting
You pass brown or dark-colored urine
You feel more tired than usual
Your skin and whites of your eyes get yellow
You have stomach pain
You have an allergic skin reaction
In clinical studies, patients reported the following common side effects while taking LIPITOR:
Diarrhea, Upset stomach,Muscle and joint pain
The following additional side effects have been reported with LIPITOR:
Tiredness and Tendon problems
Talk to your doctor or pharmacist if you have side effects that bother you or that will not go away. These are not all the side effects of LIPITOR. Ask your doctor or pharmacist for a complete list. (OMG, this isnt a complete list!) Do you REALLY want to expose your child to this? 


How to Really Protect the Children
If the medical community really wants to prevent children from a future of cardiovascular disease, here are some things they can do:
* Spend more time training doctors about nutrition and have them ask about childrens diet and exercise level during visits.
* If a child is overweight, have a serious discussion with the parents to encourage them to provide adequate nutrition and encouragement for a better lifestyle.
* Instead of spending $80 on cholesterol screening, refer the patient to a counseling session with a nutritionist. 
* If any tests should be given, it should be vitamin panel to check for 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels and other vitamin and mineral deficiencies.
* Encourage the schools to provide a more healthful school lunch and exercise programs. An "expert panel" from the medical community with a useful recommendation like that would go a long way. 



OK, now that Ive got that off my chest, Im going off to develop some yummy and healthy Thanksgiving recipes for you!
Read more »